MEGApixels relativity

  • GeekSince3
  • Graduate
  • Graduate
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Aug 07, 2005
  • Posts: 133
  • Loc: I live in Virginia
  • Status: Offline

Post October 17th, 2005, 6:08 pm

ummmm.....I want to know....No I hear jokes about people getting 8megapixel cameras and not needing that many unless they are going to be making billboards but i was thinking that i don't think that is enough megapixels so.....How many, megapixels, would I need to make a picture about the size of....let's see what is generally universally the same size...hmmm a billboard, that is on the road, how many megapixels for something like that? And let's assume that my budget has no bounds. BUT that doesn't mean I want that crazy 24 megapixel camera available only in Japan lol. That thing is sick it's like the size of a bowling ball with more knobs than home stereo systems
  • Anonymous
  • Bot
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2008
  • Posts: ?
  • Loc: Ozzuland
  • Status: Online

Post October 17th, 2005, 6:08 pm

  • GeekSince3
  • Graduate
  • Graduate
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Aug 07, 2005
  • Posts: 133
  • Loc: I live in Virginia
  • Status: Offline

Post October 17th, 2005, 6:26 pm

After some looking i've decided i hate manufactures lol. If possible could you refer a:

Nikon (optional)
8megapixels or more------------------|
7 or more optical zoom.(optional) |----------------These 2 are my must haves
interchangeable lenses---------------|

Oh and the Konica brand are they Good? Bad? Good at this bad at that.
  • Axe
  • Genius
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jan 07, 2004
  • Posts: 5744
  • Loc: Sub-level 28
  • Status: Offline

Post October 18th, 2005, 4:53 am

There's only one Nikon DSLR more than 7MP, and that's the Nikon D2x, which costs about 5 grand.
  • GeekSince3
  • Graduate
  • Graduate
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Aug 07, 2005
  • Posts: 133
  • Loc: I live in Virginia
  • Status: Offline

Post October 18th, 2005, 5:22 am

I found it for $2,325.00 :D go eBay!
  • Axe
  • Genius
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jan 07, 2004
  • Posts: 5744
  • Loc: Sub-level 28
  • Status: Offline

Post October 18th, 2005, 10:20 am

If you found a D2x on eBay for $2,325, then kiss goodbye to your $2,325 and the camera :)
  • GeekSince3
  • Graduate
  • Graduate
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Aug 07, 2005
  • Posts: 133
  • Loc: I live in Virginia
  • Status: Offline

Post October 18th, 2005, 5:03 pm

there is like 8 of them. so go for it.
  • Axe
  • Genius
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jan 07, 2004
  • Posts: 5744
  • Loc: Sub-level 28
  • Status: Offline

Post October 18th, 2005, 7:34 pm

No, what I'm saying is, if you've seen a D2x on eBay for 2325 bucks, you're going to get scammed, it's as simple as that.

This is what a D2x costs
  • Belk Media Group
  • Graphic Monk
  • Professor
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jan 12, 2005
  • Posts: 778
  • Loc: In the heart of California, Fresno.
  • Status: Offline

Post October 19th, 2005, 12:39 pm

Canon 8.2 SLR
http://shopper.cnet.com/Canon_EOS_20D_with_18-55mm_lens/4014-6501_9-30994097.html

Nikon D70
http://shopper.cnet.com/D70_Digital_SLR_Camera_wSigma_Two-Lens_Kit/4014-6501_9-30801859.html

[/url]

Nikon D2x $3969
http://shopper.cnet.com/Nikon_D2X/4014-6501_9-31117300.html
http://www.JamesBelk.com Stay Tuned for the new era in Belk Media Design
  • Axe
  • Genius
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jan 07, 2004
  • Posts: 5744
  • Loc: Sub-level 28
  • Status: Offline

Post October 19th, 2005, 1:18 pm

OriginNO_II wrote:
Nikon D2x $3969
http://shopper.cnet.com/Nikon_D2X/4014-6501_9-31117300.html


When you're paying well below retail, you're going to get ripped off.

http://www.resellerratings.com/seller9193.html <-- That's who's selling it for $3969.
  • GeekSince3
  • Graduate
  • Graduate
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Aug 07, 2005
  • Posts: 133
  • Loc: I live in Virginia
  • Status: Offline

Post October 20th, 2005, 10:49 am

Though not perfect that Canon is very ideal thanks much OriginNO_II.
  • Axe
  • Genius
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jan 07, 2004
  • Posts: 5744
  • Loc: Sub-level 28
  • Status: Offline

Post October 20th, 2005, 1:38 pm

Yeah, the 20D isn't a bad camera, but you need to get some GOOD glass to justify using it.

I tried one out with a 105mm f/2.8 Macro lens & Canon ringlight macro flash to shoot some baby egyptian & monocled cobras. Absolutely astounding detail.
  • The1
  • Student
  • Student
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2004
  • Posts: 89
  • Loc: Australia
  • Status: Offline

Post November 2nd, 2005, 4:54 am

I guess it comes down to what your doing with the camera, megapixel is only one thing in the equation.

There's the camera, lens's, flash's, different f rating lens's, optical zoom, it all comes down to budget and what you want out of the camera. Megapixel determins the resolution of the image eg 1280x1024, so higher megapixel the larger the image, the larger the prints before loosing quality.

Generaly though, more money, better camera. Set yourself a money limit and go read reviews and see what's the better camera for your needs.

The Canon Rebel is getting alot of attention atm..
  • Axe
  • Genius
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jan 07, 2004
  • Posts: 5744
  • Loc: Sub-level 28
  • Status: Offline

Post November 2nd, 2005, 12:20 pm

With DSLR, the lens isn't an issue. Because regardless of what body you get, the lenses are a separate purchase.

The D70s comes with the 18-70DX lens, but I'm not limited to using JUST that lens, like I would be on a point-n-shoot with a fixed lens.

"Optical Zoom" is all you have on a Digital SLR. There is no "digital zoom" (which is absolutely useless).

You were close on your megapixels vs. detail comment.

Yes, more megapixels == more pixels in your image == larger image.

BUT, that does not necessarily mean better quality. The images from the 4.1MP Nikon D2h/D2hs are MUCH sharper & crisper than those produced by the D100 (which is 6.1MP).

It all comes down to the QUALITY of the sensor, not just how many megapixels it has.

The Canon Rebel is getting a lot of attention (as is the RebelXT), but they're very entry level cameras, just like the Nikon D50, D70 & D70s cameras.

Yesterday Nikon just announced the impending release of the D200 (10.2MP, 5FPS, real nice DSLR) for $1699. I'll definitely be picking one of those up as my next camera.
  • The1
  • Student
  • Student
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Dec 15, 2004
  • Posts: 89
  • Loc: Australia
  • Status: Offline

Post November 2nd, 2005, 3:40 pm

your quite right, i was just stating generally, if you put a good dslr with a granny and a cheap digital with a person that is steady 9 times out of ten i wonder who would take a better picture? also i doubt the grandma would know how to even use the functions on a dslr.

I only own a Canon A95 camera it does quite well, you can check out my gallery, i would own a dslr but the simple fact is im poor :oops: lol

EDIT: yes sensors are an important part in it as well.

Post Information

  • Total Posts in this topic: 14 posts
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests
  • You cannot post new topics in this forum
  • You cannot reply to topics in this forum
  • You cannot edit your posts in this forum
  • You cannot delete your posts in this forum
  • You cannot post attachments in this forum
 
 

© 2011 Unmelted, LLC. Ozzu® is a registered trademark of Unmelted, LLC.