The Mozilla Firefox Appreciation thread

  • digitalMedia
  • a.k.a. dM
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Dec 29, 2003
  • Posts: 5169
  • Loc: SC-USA
  • Status: Offline

Post February 12th, 2004, 7:46 am

ATNO/TW wrote:

http://atnopro.com/ozzu/screenshot.jpg



Hey man, there's a windows update available in your screen cap. You better go get it. hahahaha.
- dM
  • Anonymous
  • Bot
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2008
  • Posts: ?
  • Loc: Ozzuland
  • Status: Online

Post February 12th, 2004, 7:46 am

  • scarecrow
  • Novice
  • Novice
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Feb 08, 2004
  • Posts: 25
  • Loc: ga
  • Status: Offline

Post February 12th, 2004, 8:14 am

ATNO/TW wrote:
If anyone ever tries to tell you Win2K can't handle the multiple "stuff "-- just show them that screen capture to prove them wrong. I'm still alive and kickin'.


time will tell :roll:

windows will become slower over time as you install more programs and the registry get's filled with junk.

Linux with an X server running is slower than a fresh XP install but after months pass, XP becomes slower and slower.

the main reason Windows is faster is because it has a registry which i believe stays loaded into memory while you work. one app i used showed which program was reading which registry key and it was constantly reading the registry and updating.

on the other side, linux has no registry and it is a bit slower than XP when using X because linux uses plain text config files. much easier to understand and make changes.

linux and X performance stays constant and the linux filesystem is more stable than XP. i do not want to start a flame war over which is better or faster.

of course i'm no expert and my opinions are based on my experiences as a windows and linux user.

update: i just found out that the reason Galeon was removed from fedora was because it was replaced with Epiphany. since it's already installed, i will try Epiphany later.


scarecrow
  • scarecrow
  • Novice
  • Novice
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Feb 08, 2004
  • Posts: 25
  • Loc: ga
  • Status: Offline

Post February 12th, 2004, 8:29 am

digitalMedia wrote:
ATNO/TW wrote:

http://atnopro.com/ozzu/screenshot.jpg



Hey man, there's a windows update available in your screen cap. You better go get it. hahahaha.


and you can turn off that Windows Messenger or MSN Messenger "if" you mostly use Yahoo or ICQ:

Goto C:\Program Files\
Rename "Messenger" to "MessengerOFF"
Rename "MSN Messenger" to "MSN MessengerOFF"
(without the quotes of course)
Contrary to what it says, it will not damage other
programs or keep them from running.
note: you may have change the folder permissions if it's read-only, then rename it, and change it back to read-only.

why does microsoft frighten users by saying it will damage other programs? that's the microsoft way to get you to keep their products active, i guess.

sc
  • digitalMedia
  • a.k.a. dM
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Dec 29, 2003
  • Posts: 5169
  • Loc: SC-USA
  • Status: Offline

Post February 15th, 2004, 7:00 am

My first gripe with Firefox is the way it's rendering form elements with styles applied. Kind of surprising since the Mozilla browser had been doing this so well.
- dM
  • ATNO/TW
  • Super Moderator
  • Super Moderator
  • User avatar
  • Joined: May 28, 2003
  • Posts: 23407
  • Loc: Woodbridge VA
  • Status: Offline

Post February 15th, 2004, 7:40 am

digitalMedia wrote:
My first gripe with Firefox is the way it's rendering form elements with styles applied. Kind of surprising since the Mozilla browser had been doing this so well.


Seems to work OK for me. This page displays exactly as I wrote it and it's identical on IE6 or Foxfire: http://housesunlimitedinc.com/sell.html (Light blue text fields with grey text). I seem to recall when I wrote it though that I had to apply the style class to each input element in order to get it to work on NS4x versions. That may be why it displays as intended on Foxfire. I'd be curious to see a page where it's not working right for you.
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1 except for ::1."
Alexandria Networks. Leader in IT consulting for associations/non-profits, and small to medium sized businesses around the northern Virginia and Washington D.C. metro area.
  • ATNO/TW
  • Super Moderator
  • Super Moderator
  • User avatar
  • Joined: May 28, 2003
  • Posts: 23407
  • Loc: Woodbridge VA
  • Status: Offline

Post February 15th, 2004, 7:42 am

scarecrow thanks for the tip on messenger. I did know that. I use messenger but not frequently. Usually, I forget to turn it on.
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1 except for ::1."
Alexandria Networks. Leader in IT consulting for associations/non-profits, and small to medium sized businesses around the northern Virginia and Washington D.C. metro area.
  • digitalMedia
  • a.k.a. dM
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Dec 29, 2003
  • Posts: 5169
  • Loc: SC-USA
  • Status: Offline

Post February 15th, 2004, 8:05 am

ATNO/TW wrote:
digitalMedia wrote:
My first gripe with Firefox is the way it's rendering form elements with styles applied. Kind of surprising since the Mozilla browser had been doing this so well.


Seems to work OK for me. This page displays exactly as I wrote it and it's identical on IE6 or Foxfire: http://housesunlimitedinc.com/sell.html (Light blue text fields with grey text). I seem to recall when I wrote it though that I had to apply the style class to each input element in order to get it to work on NS4x versions. That may be why it displays as intended on Foxfire. I'd be curious to see a page where it's not working right for you.


I didn't look at the source, are you applying height and width attribs in your style definition?
- dM
  • ATNO/TW
  • Super Moderator
  • Super Moderator
  • User avatar
  • Joined: May 28, 2003
  • Posts: 23407
  • Loc: Woodbridge VA
  • Status: Offline

Post February 15th, 2004, 8:17 am

No. Just these two classes

Code: [ Select ]
.form {font-family : "MS Serif", "New York", serif;
background-color: #CCFFFF;
color: #808080;
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: normal;
}

TD.formtext {color : #000099;
    font-family : "MS Serif", "New York", serif;
    font-size : 14px;
    font-weight : normal;
    text-align : left;
    background-image : none;
    
    }
  1. .form {font-family : "MS Serif", "New York", serif;
  2. background-color: #CCFFFF;
  3. color: #808080;
  4. font-size: 14px;
  5. font-weight: normal;
  6. }
  7. TD.formtext {color : #000099;
  8.     font-family : "MS Serif", "New York", serif;
  9.     font-size : 14px;
  10.     font-weight : normal;
  11.     text-align : left;
  12.     background-image : none;
  13.     
  14.     }


Here's another one I did almost the same way:
http://cigloans.com/apply.html
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1 except for ::1."
Alexandria Networks. Leader in IT consulting for associations/non-profits, and small to medium sized businesses around the northern Virginia and Washington D.C. metro area.
  • digitalMedia
  • a.k.a. dM
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Dec 29, 2003
  • Posts: 5169
  • Loc: SC-USA
  • Status: Offline

Post February 15th, 2004, 8:39 am

Here's what I'm talking about. It's not a problem in this form, obviously, but I do a lot of layouts that require more exactness than this. That's one of the reasons I love CSS so much, it was giving me the exactness that I required. Also, there should be exactly 15px between the two blocks. IE, Moz1.3, Opera all get it right.

I know I'm being picky...but it's my job to be picky. ;)


IE
Image
Moz 1.3
Image
Opera
Image
Firefox
Image
- dM
  • ATNO/TW
  • Super Moderator
  • Super Moderator
  • User avatar
  • Joined: May 28, 2003
  • Posts: 23407
  • Loc: Woodbridge VA
  • Status: Offline

Post February 15th, 2004, 8:44 am

I see what you are saying. I've never tried playing around with that. I'll have to do some experimenting with it sometime soon.
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1 except for ::1."
Alexandria Networks. Leader in IT consulting for associations/non-profits, and small to medium sized businesses around the northern Virginia and Washington D.C. metro area.
  • Cold Canuck
  • Proficient
  • Proficient
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jul 14, 2003
  • Posts: 404
  • Loc: Michigan, U.S. of eh
  • Status: Offline

Post February 15th, 2004, 8:46 am

Ummmm, was the inclusion of both english and what looks to be italian, intentional?

The headers for the text boxes are in english, and the little informational paragraphs are in italian...seems that both would be in italian, eh :?


Cheers, eh...


C.C.
  • digitalMedia
  • a.k.a. dM
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Dec 29, 2003
  • Posts: 5169
  • Loc: SC-USA
  • Status: Offline

Post February 15th, 2004, 8:55 am

No, it's not italian. It's commonly known as Lorem Ipsum text. It's been used as place-holder copy for about 500 years.

http://www.lipsum.com/

;)
- dM
  • Cold Canuck
  • Proficient
  • Proficient
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jul 14, 2003
  • Posts: 404
  • Loc: Michigan, U.S. of eh
  • Status: Offline

Post February 15th, 2004, 9:00 am

I've used that filler text myself, but it didn't register :oops:

Maybe I should just shut the hell up and simply read posts from now on :lol:



C.C.
  • digitalMedia
  • a.k.a. dM
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Dec 29, 2003
  • Posts: 5169
  • Loc: SC-USA
  • Status: Offline

Post February 15th, 2004, 9:03 am

NO!!!! Don't do that, please. If everyone only read posts it would be a pretty boring forum.

:) ;)

I bet a couple people will discover Lorem ipsum for the first time thanks to your question.

:thumbsup:
- dM
  • ATNO/TW
  • Super Moderator
  • Super Moderator
  • User avatar
  • Joined: May 28, 2003
  • Posts: 23407
  • Loc: Woodbridge VA
  • Status: Offline

Post February 15th, 2004, 9:20 am

Cold Canuck wrote:
I've used that filler text myself, but it didn't register :oops:

C.C.


*lol -- I was wondering about that, because I KNOW I've seen you use it!
Like your new Avatar, btw.
"There's no place like 127.0.0.1 except for ::1."
Alexandria Networks. Leader in IT consulting for associations/non-profits, and small to medium sized businesses around the northern Virginia and Washington D.C. metro area.
  • Anonymous
  • Bot
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2008
  • Posts: ?
  • Loc: Ozzuland
  • Status: Online

Post February 15th, 2004, 9:20 am

Post Information

  • Total Posts in this topic: 53 posts
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 134 guests
  • You cannot post new topics in this forum
  • You cannot reply to topics in this forum
  • You cannot edit your posts in this forum
  • You cannot delete your posts in this forum
  • You cannot post attachments in this forum
 
cron
 

© 2011 Unmelted, LLC. Ozzu® is a registered trademark of Unmelted, LLC.