Page Rank Update Megathread (update 31.12.2009)
- rtchar
- Expert


- Joined: Mar 22, 2004
- Posts: 606
- Loc: Canada
- Status: Offline
Any one notice that there are database type links this time also?
I have one link listed in my backlinks as ...
http://www.domain.com/cgi-bin/links/rate.cgi?ID=483. I let that one drop because I did not expect credit for this type of link.
Another one has my complete URL listed in the content of the page, but the link is ...
http://www.domain.com/redirect.php/action/links/goto/58?
Interesting backlinks.
Guess I have to review those sites that are not direct links?
- Anonymous
- Bot


- Joined: 25 Feb 2008
- Posts: ?
- Loc: Ozzuland
- Status: Online
- Axe
- Genius


- Joined: Jan 07, 2004
- Posts: 5744
- Loc: Sub-level 28
- Status: Offline
"I've heard speculation that Google maybe mixing the backlinks results to prevent people from harvesting high PR sites pointing to their competitors to gather more backlinks for themselves." - but don't we have tools like PROG that allow us to see PR anway? If that were the case then they sould just stop showing PR.
From what I've heard it's specifically because we CAN now so easily see the PR that Google are changing this.
Before, even if you got a list of somebody's backlinks, it was still a lot of work to visit each of these sites, get the PR through the toolbar, and figure out who was worth trading a link with, or convincing to link to you.
Now, it's a lot easier to see at a glance on a page who is high PR, which seems to be why the backlinks lists have become a little muddied, showing many more PR0-3 pages, and actually not showing all high PR pages in the results (I've seen many large sites LOSE big numbers backlinks SERPS, yet in reality, the pages linking to their URL has actually gone up).
- rtchar
- Expert


- Joined: Mar 22, 2004
- Posts: 606
- Loc: Canada
- Status: Offline
Seems like a lot of work for Google to protect MY backlinks. I think there is a deeper point we are missing here. The problem is that by the time the links are reported as backlinks your competition has 1-2 months jump on you.
Backlinks and PR is easy to get. I put my link harvester up here:
http://www.mrktcity.com/linkpr.html
I can take any link page and pull all the external links ... then query all the site PR's from Google.
PROG was so much better because it gave the page rank of the page containing the link.
Next week Ill put my database link harvester out there....
- phaugh
- Professor


- Joined: Sep 30, 2003
- Posts: 796
- Status: Offline
I'm seeing internal backlinks that are 5 clicks away from a PR5 page....these pages have always had low PR..1 or 2. My internal pages that are linked directly to the front page (PR5) are not all listed...and the PR indicator on the toolbar says the pages are PR0...anyone else see this type of behavior?
- Johan007
- Guru


- Joined: Sep 17, 2003
- Posts: 1080
- Loc: Aldershot, UK
- Status: Offline
dmoz.org editor link does show up - well mine does
back links from OZZU have gone

but it has not hit bigwebmaster.com in any other way. This is weird cos other forum links are showing up including phpBB.com that never used to show up. Sites with less than PR4 are also showing up however ranking has not changed.
Read my Movie Reviews punk!
- rtchar
- Expert


- Joined: Mar 22, 2004
- Posts: 606
- Loc: Canada
- Status: Offline
I still don't see any changes in PR ... especially for new pages that would normally be updated after a regular BL update.
Does this update really count, or is it simply an algorithm change?
I still stick to my prediction that the REAL update won't happen until Aug 4-5.

- phaugh
- Professor


- Joined: Sep 30, 2003
- Posts: 796
- Status: Offline
This looks more like a glitch in the system than an update....there are simply unexplainable things. People are wildly speculating that the backlinks showing now could be future pages that will have PR4 or higher...but based on my site strucutre it's impossible for that to happen. It's almost looks like the backlinks that are showing are the page that won't have good PR....I have about 100 pages added last month that are showing up as backlinks and none of my other pages are showing up...these new pages are so far down the site strucutre that they could not get PR 4
- Axe
- Genius


- Joined: Jan 07, 2004
- Posts: 5744
- Loc: Sub-level 28
- Status: Offline
Yeah, it looks like they may be showing pages that are PR0-3 only, and ditching the PR4 pages from the listings to prevent people stealing others' high PR backlinks.
- Johan007
- Guru


- Joined: Sep 17, 2003
- Posts: 1080
- Loc: Aldershot, UK
- Status: Offline
erm I wish Axe
Think your basing that on Ozzu back links
http://www.webmasterbrain.com/prog/sear ... com&num=10
All my site like are showing all PR pages that link to you. Check out:
http://www.webmasterbrain.com/prog/sear ... .uk&num=10
Very little or no change in ranking.
- Axe
- Genius


- Joined: Jan 07, 2004
- Posts: 5744
- Loc: Sub-level 28
- Status: Offline
erm I wish Axe
Think your basing that on Ozzu back links.
Actually, I didn't even look at the Ozzu backlinks. It was a theory I'd seen mentioned in a few places, and a couple of my domains are showing up 1500 backlinks, but almost all of the URLs that come up in those results were PR0-3 pages.
IF the theory has any truth to it, it could be that the PR4+ pages being shown in backlinks now are simply waiting to drop. PR didn't change during this "update".
But, without seeing what happens on the next full PR/Backlinks update, it's going to be impossible to say.
- bbott1982
- Proficient


- Joined: May 22, 2004
- Posts: 320
- Loc: NJ, USA
- Status: Offline
I'm giving up on trying to track pr/backlink updates. They're so random there is no point.
Better off to just keep working on your site getting backlinks and optimizing it - when the update does occur you'll have a present for that day

and hopefully your hardwork will have paid off.
Link Lasso Web Directory | Webmaster Forums
- Axe
- Genius


- Joined: Jan 07, 2004
- Posts: 5744
- Loc: Sub-level 28
- Status: Offline
People who do SEO for a living, can't pay their bills with hope
Of course, the backlinks are only one small aspect of SEO.
- phaugh
- Professor


- Joined: Sep 30, 2003
- Posts: 796
- Status: Offline
Do you really think google cares that people try to get good backlinks....if so they could just eliminate or devalue the backlink portion of the algo...this would be allot easier than displaying bogus baclinks...they screwed up...It's just like the florida update...something is going to happen but we won't know what until it happens.
- Axe
- Genius


- Joined: Jan 07, 2004
- Posts: 5744
- Loc: Sub-level 28
- Status: Offline
They might care if they've seen a huge load on their servers now that there's a PR checksum code out there for the masses.
If everybody's now checking all the backlinks easily and pulling out the high PR pages, it can seriously muddy their results.
- Anonymous
- Bot


- Joined: 25 Feb 2008
- Posts: ?
- Loc: Ozzuland
- Status: Online
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
To Reply to this topic you need to LOGIN or REGISTER. It is free.
Post Information
- Total Posts in this topic: 740 posts
- Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests
- You cannot post new topics in this forum
- You cannot reply to topics in this forum
- You cannot edit your posts in this forum
- You cannot delete your posts in this forum
- You cannot post attachments in this forum