I've read numerous stories about sites getting dropped from Google results for "
" over the years, enough so that any time I've recieved an email asking me if I would be interested in selling links on my sites I've simply ignored the emails just to be safe.
The thing is, I'd never seen Google actually say anything about this being bad. I just kinda took everyones' word for it since I'd seen it so often. I couldn't help but wonder lately, if this was just a FUD story that marketing people spread around to keep people afraid of selling links so there's less people selling links making them more valuable.
Well today I had an extra minute when the thought popped into my head so I decided to look it up at Google and I found
which seems like a pretty definitive answer to me.
Paid LinksGoogle and most other search engines use links to determine reputation. A site's ranking in Google search results is partly based on analysis of those sites that link to it. Link-based analysis is an extremely useful way of measuring a site's value, and has greatly improved the quality of web search. Both the quantity and, more importantly, the quality of links count towards this rating.
However, some SEOs and webmasters engage in the practice of buying and selling links that pass PageRank, disregarding the quality of the links, the sources, and the long-term impact it will have on their sites. Buying or selling links that pass PageRank is in violation of Google's webmaster guidelines and can negatively impact a site's ranking in search results.
Not all paid links violate our guidelines. Buying and selling links is a normal part of the economy of the web when done for advertising purposes, and not for manipulation of search results. Links purchased for advertising should be designated as such. This can be done in several ways, such as:
- Adding a rel="nofollow" attribute to the <a> tag
- Redirecting the links to an intermediate page that is blocked from search engines with a robots.txt file