windows and unix

  • wassy
  • Novice
  • Novice
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2006
  • Posts: 25
  • Status: Offline

Post April 29th, 2006, 7:14 pm

Ok i have a bit of a noob question but what does it mean when some hosts have unix and windows hosting does that mean to get a unix hosting package you have to have unix on your computer and to have a windows hosting package you have to have window on you computer im just wondering because unix plans are a bit cheaper than windows plans but i have a window os could someone explain this to me please.
  • Anonymous
  • Bot
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2008
  • Posts: ?
  • Loc: Ozzuland
  • Status: Online

Post April 29th, 2006, 7:14 pm

  • Daemonguy
  • Moderator
  • Web Master
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jan 23, 2004
  • Posts: 2673
  • Loc: Somewhere outside the box in Sarasota, FL.
  • Status: Offline

Post April 30th, 2006, 6:57 am

It means that the host itself is either running Windows or Unix.

From your perspective, speaking entirely functionally, there's no difference. The way in which you will interact with the host is exactly the same -- or at least very similar.

Now how the host itself functions, that is entirely another story.
"It's always a long day, 86,400 won't fit into a short."
  • wassy
  • Novice
  • Novice
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2006
  • Posts: 25
  • Status: Offline

Post April 30th, 2006, 9:03 am

ok thanks but what is the difference is windows better or something because it is usually at least a dollar more for the same package
  • xfahmix
  • Proficient
  • Proficient
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jan 07, 2006
  • Posts: 326
  • Loc: Cork, Ireland
  • Status: Offline

Post April 30th, 2006, 9:39 am

I have no idea why most of the windows hosting is more expensive, probably because the license to run Windows based server is more expensive compared to linux server.

More important factor is what kind of script that you want to install and run for your site. PHP scripts can be installed in Linux server while Windows server can run ASP and ASP.net.

Many of the opensource scripts are available for linux server (PHP) so if you have no idea where to start, I recommend you to get a linux based server instead.
Web Design Malaysia
xfahmix.com - Do what you want, but I'll decide my own history
  • wassy
  • Novice
  • Novice
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2006
  • Posts: 25
  • Status: Offline

Post April 30th, 2006, 11:33 am

ok thanks a lot for the info
  • Uncensored-Hosting
  • Proficient
  • Proficient
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Sep 26, 2004
  • Posts: 383
  • Loc: Los Angeles
  • Status: Offline

Post May 1st, 2006, 7:37 am

Windows is also subjected to more security and virus exploits than *nix based OS's. IMO Windows are less stable and require more reboots also. However I'm sure some will disagree. The cost difference is due to the fact that almost all software on a Windows server is fee based while *nix based servers are the exact opposite. You should also know that php can be run on Windows and ASP can run on *nix based boxes. I personally would not do it but there are those that will, do and swear by it.
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE! • Ddos, DOS, Brute force, Password Trading & Proxy attack defense. • No price increase EVER!
sales@uncensored-hosting.com Uncensored-Hosting
  • wassy
  • Novice
  • Novice
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2006
  • Posts: 25
  • Status: Offline

Post May 1st, 2006, 8:55 am

ok just one more question does that mean i have to switch all my .html files to .php files for a linux server?
  • Daemonguy
  • Moderator
  • Web Master
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jan 23, 2004
  • Posts: 2673
  • Loc: Somewhere outside the box in Sarasota, FL.
  • Status: Offline

Post May 1st, 2006, 8:57 am

No. :)
"It's always a long day, 86,400 won't fit into a short."
  • wassy
  • Novice
  • Novice
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Apr 26, 2006
  • Posts: 25
  • Status: Offline

Post May 1st, 2006, 8:17 pm

ok sweet thx again for all the info
  • john551
  • Beginner
  • Beginner
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Sep 17, 2005
  • Posts: 41
  • Status: Offline

Post May 4th, 2006, 10:15 am

Learn more about linux vs windows at http://www.web-hosting-world.com/linux-windows.php
  • Lukus
  • Novice
  • Novice
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: May 03, 2006
  • Posts: 17
  • Loc: UK - Essex
  • Status: Offline

Post May 5th, 2006, 12:20 am

Uncensored-Hosting wrote:
Windows is also subjected to more security and virus exploits than *nix based OS's. IMO Windows are less stable and require more reboots also. However I'm sure some will disagree.


No one can disagree! It's true! :)

Example, most of our Linux boxes have uptimes now of 3yrs plus, most windows boxes had to be reset the other week for updates! Well, that or a crash, can't remember :P The reason that Windows is generally more expensive, in our case anyhows, is that as someone pointed out, the licenses are more expensive, and also there's alot more maintenance that'll have to be done on a windows box, rather than a box running Linux mainly due to stability.
  • CartikaHosting
  • Proficient
  • Proficient
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Oct 30, 2004
  • Posts: 455
  • Loc: Wishing I was in Kicking Horse
  • Status: Offline

Post May 6th, 2006, 11:51 am

Quote:
Example, most of our Linux boxes have uptimes now of 3yrs plus


You havent rebooted your linux boxesin 3 yrs !

How do you apply patches and such? Havne you needed to upgrade RAM or something in all that time?

Quote:
No one can disagree! It's true!


We run both *nix and Windows servers and I am not certain I agree that one is "better" then the other - they both have their respective advantages and disadvantages.
Andrew - http://www.cartikahosting.com
Business Grade, Clustered Application Hosting
Windows, Linux, Coldfusion, FreeBSD, MS Exchange and Dedicated Servers
  • Uncensored-Hosting
  • Proficient
  • Proficient
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Sep 26, 2004
  • Posts: 383
  • Loc: Los Angeles
  • Status: Offline

Post May 6th, 2006, 2:10 pm

3yrs is indicative of neglect not stability. Minimally patches and kernel upgrades need to be performed. These alone occur at least once per year and almost always require a reboot to take effect.
MONEY BACK GUARANTEE! • Ddos, DOS, Brute force, Password Trading & Proxy attack defense. • No price increase EVER!
sales@uncensored-hosting.com Uncensored-Hosting
  • CartikaHosting
  • Proficient
  • Proficient
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Oct 30, 2004
  • Posts: 455
  • Loc: Wishing I was in Kicking Horse
  • Status: Offline

Post May 6th, 2006, 2:14 pm

Quote:
3yrs is indicative of neglect not stability.


U-H, I was trying to be a little more subtle then this, but, you pretty much nailed it :D
Andrew - http://www.cartikahosting.com
Business Grade, Clustered Application Hosting
Windows, Linux, Coldfusion, FreeBSD, MS Exchange and Dedicated Servers
  • Lukus
  • Novice
  • Novice
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: May 03, 2006
  • Posts: 17
  • Loc: UK - Essex
  • Status: Offline

Post May 8th, 2006, 2:37 am

CartikaHosting wrote:
Quote:
Example, most of our Linux boxes have uptimes now of 3yrs plus


You havent rebooted your linux boxesin 3 yrs !

How do you apply patches and such? Havne you needed to upgrade RAM or something in all that time?

Quote:
No one can disagree! It's true!


We run both *nix and Windows servers and I am not certain I agree that one is "better" then the other - they both have their respective advantages and disadvantages.



No one can disagree that *nix is far more stable than windows. I agree that they have both have plus points, but the matter in hand was stability.

With the uptime, I was referring to our DNS servers and such like. Our hosting servers are taken down from time to time for upgrades, and kernel patches for local user exploits, although on most boxes we run FreeBSD, which i'm not sure if you are aware, has had only one remote exploit since it was conceived - in openssh - which was patched without the need for a reboot. Hense the majority of our boxes - that have not needed to be upgraded - have uptimes of 36months plus.

It's not uncommon to find this, various companies I've worked for and/or been invloved with have had uptimes around or even better than this, up to 5yrs that I can remember infact.
  • Anonymous
  • Bot
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2008
  • Posts: ?
  • Loc: Ozzuland
  • Status: Online

Post May 8th, 2006, 2:37 am

Post Information

  • Total Posts in this topic: 20 posts
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests
  • You cannot post new topics in this forum
  • You cannot reply to topics in this forum
  • You cannot edit your posts in this forum
  • You cannot delete your posts in this forum
  • You cannot post attachments in this forum
 
 

© 2011 Unmelted, LLC. Ozzu® is a registered trademark of Unmelted, LLC.