Prominence computation

Hi, anyone who knows the computation for prominence?
My site's prominence are only 57.63 despite my primiray keyword are located at also at the title of the site.

Thanks.

This is based on how close to the beginning of the element being analyzed that your keyword or phrase is found. If your keyword is the first word, then it will have a prominence of 100. The further into the element it gets, the lower the value will be.
For example, if your keyword is Flyfishing, you would have a meta description prominence of 100 if the description reads 'flyfishing is the most exciting sport of all time'. If flyfishing was in the middle of that phrase, the prominence would be 50.

If this is what you're looking for?

what if i have my keyword in the title and at the same time at the footer of the site?

No problem but don't repeat it more than 3 times to be safe. If you want to optomize more consider variations of the keywords. ie - car hire/motor vehicle rentals. Gogle will soon implement LSI where they search words that relate to others. Try keep ahead of the pack! When They'll start using it I'm not sure?!

Thanks DodgeCroft but my site's density is only 3.56% if i'm not mistaken. my keyword can be seen in title, meta keyword, meta desc, body and i think 3 times in alt tags. if I lessen them to 3 times then my site's density might drop also. what do you think should i do then?

When I say try keep it to 3 I mean in the body. What optomization software are you using?

oh. I thought it's for the whole code. thanks a lot DodgeCroft.

By the way what do you mean by LSI?

Have a look at this and search it out a bit to learn more...

http://www.numberoneinyourniche.com/blo ... arter.html

awesome this is a big help for me. thanks for the help. I really apreciated it.

Sure thing Man! As you learn more pass it back to those that are newer.

I'll do that for sure.

Here's a previous thread by the mods...

http://www.ozzu.com/other-google-information-and-resources/latent-semantic-indexing-lsi-t40074.html&hi ... c+indexing

ok i'll check it. thanks.