Taking lots of photos

  • SpooF
  • ٩๏̯͡๏۶
  • Bronze Member
  • User avatar
  • Joined: May 22, 2004
  • Posts: 3415
  • Loc: Richland, WA
  • Status: Offline

Post January 22nd, 2008, 9:16 am

I was reading through this topic and was wondering about lots of photos

Cameras have a shutter life, and I was wondering what it really means? Do the cameras just stop working after so many shots? Or does the number just mean that the shutter may fail after so many shots?
#define NULL (::rand() % 2)
  • Anonymous
  • Bot
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2008
  • Posts: ?
  • Loc: Ozzuland
  • Status: Online

Post January 22nd, 2008, 9:16 am

  • Breeze
  • Photographer
  • Guru
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Apr 22, 2007
  • Posts: 1029
  • Loc: Australia
  • Status: Offline

Post January 22nd, 2008, 9:28 am

It's not really the number of shots, but it's a combination of the amount and the care you have for your camera. The shutter may slowly get worse and worse untill it simply refuses to work any longer.

Mind you, if you take care with your camera, the shutter will take a VERY long time to wear down.
Photography Gallery | aaronmarc.id.au
  • Ishii
  • Proficient
  • Proficient
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Jun 06, 2005
  • Posts: 355
  • Loc: Gilbert, AZ
  • Status: Offline

Post January 22nd, 2008, 2:53 pm

What breeze said. Camera manufacturers rate their shutters for a # of actuations, but it that number is kind of like how light bulbs are rated. A higher number means you're getting a product that's been tested and the minimum expected time before failure is X. It could fail before X, but most likely it will last a lot longer than X. My friend started his wedding photography business with a Nikon D70, which was rated for somewhere between 50k and 100k actuations. He's put several hundred thousand actuations on it and it still works fine.
Photography-http://www.staticfreephoto.com
Real Estate-http://www.flinskrealestate.com
  • neksus
  • Mastermind
  • Mastermind
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Sep 10, 2004
  • Posts: 2194
  • Loc: Canada
  • Status: Offline

Post March 31st, 2008, 4:14 pm

Ishii wrote:
which was rated for somewhere between 50k and 100k actuations. He's put several hundred thousand actuations on it and it still works fine.


That's refreshing to hear :)
  • jolly_web
  • Newbie
  • Newbie
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Mar 31, 2008
  • Posts: 8
  • Status: Offline

Post March 31st, 2008, 5:39 pm

Hopefully you won't be needing your current camera after the 50k picture mark. :)
  • UNFLUX
  • Genius
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Dec 20, 2002
  • Posts: 6382
  • Loc: twitter.com/unflux
  • Status: Offline

Post April 1st, 2008, 8:44 am

I'm pushing 19k with mine! I was amazed to see I had taken so many. I knew I had, but the sheer number makes me giggle.
UNFLUX.FOTO
  • neksus
  • Mastermind
  • Mastermind
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Sep 10, 2004
  • Posts: 2194
  • Loc: Canada
  • Status: Offline

Post April 1st, 2008, 9:06 am

jolly_web wrote:
Hopefully you won't be needing your current camera after the 50k picture mark. :)


lol - I'm halfway there and I've only had this camera for a year. I'm hoping to pick up a 40D (well, a 5D/successor would be nice, but I'm so used to this 1.6x crop :P).

UNFLUX wrote:
I'm pushing 19k with mine! I was amazed to see I had taken so many. I knew I had, but the sheer number makes me giggle.


It's awe-inspiring, isn't it? It's amazing how fast pictures stack up - or rather, actuations stack up. I'm sure you haven't kept all those pictures :P
Imagine the costs of those in film!
  • UNFLUX
  • Genius
  • Genius
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Dec 20, 2002
  • Posts: 6382
  • Loc: twitter.com/unflux
  • Status: Offline

Post April 1st, 2008, 1:49 pm

neksus wrote:
It's awe-inspiring, isn't it? It's amazing how fast pictures stack up - or rather, actuations stack up. I'm sure you haven't kept all those pictures :P
Imagine the costs of those in film!

It's definitely amazing to think I snapped my finger off that many times. I did take a year off, so I suppose I can say it's been 2.5 full years with this camera. If I can't swing a new one before July, I'll be doing what I did back in '06, snapping off several thousand in less than a week. And just beyond that, is my cousin's wedding which I have the honor of being the alternate photographer. I'm sure between those 2 events, I'll rack up some nicer numbers.

and no i haven't kept every single photo, but probably 90% of them. I have tons of storage and usually weed out the ones I want to use and put everything else "away." Besides that, I probably have 3 separate copies of all my photos at one time just to be safe. It's too much of a pain to burn them off any more. And with disk space so cheap, why bother?

Considering that vs film, I don't even want to think about it. I can't tell you how many rolls of film I shot and liked 1-2 shots. Sometimes, I wouldn't like any at all and wasted the roll. Oh well, growing pains of a photographer, no?
UNFLUX.FOTO
  • neksus
  • Mastermind
  • Mastermind
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Sep 10, 2004
  • Posts: 2194
  • Loc: Canada
  • Status: Offline

Post April 1st, 2008, 1:51 pm

I agreed to be the main photographer at my fiance's brother's wedding - I've been racking my brain but I'm sure I'll be fine. Preparation, preparation, preparation!

Post Information

  • Total Posts in this topic: 9 posts
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests
  • You cannot post new topics in this forum
  • You cannot reply to topics in this forum
  • You cannot edit your posts in this forum
  • You cannot delete your posts in this forum
  • You cannot post attachments in this forum
 
 

© 2011 Unmelted, LLC. Ozzu® is a registered trademark of Unmelted, LLC.