Search found 147 matches

Actual Results

Post Posted: November 20th, 2010, 8:22 pm

either what wpas said above, or in the event that there are spaces in the field, you can do this: [code] while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)){ if(trim($row['visitor_bb']) != ''){ echo "<tr>"; echo "<td>" . $row['visitor_bb'] . "</td...

Post Posted: November 20th, 2010, 8:18 pm

I think you meant where you were using:
Code: [ Select ]
if($_GET['loc'] = 3){

Going by your pasted example anyway.

Post Posted: December 21st, 2008, 1:49 am

Quite a few people have seen a slowdown of inbound links being "seen" by GWT for semi to competitive terms during the holiday this year.

Post Posted: December 21st, 2008, 1:48 am

Because PR is only a single factor in rankings and not the largest one at that. Also, PR is exported to the toolbar only once every 3 months or so, so a site that shows PR0 may actually not be a PR0. An this is all without saying that toolbar PR is actually just a pretty green bar and not the actual...

Post Posted: December 21st, 2005, 2:50 am

"We registered a site 5 days ago, launched it yesterday officially. Today it is sitting at #11 for one of its main 2 keywords..." I'd like know what competitive keywords you saw jump up to #11 in 5 days and remain there. if you check that site again today, it is now at #8 :) For those interested, t...

Post Posted: November 29th, 2005, 4:59 pm

Hi meman, actually "sandbox affect" would be a better term, but what really bothers me is not the name, but the lack of a clear definition. That is not what you stated tho in your original post that started all this. You stated "It does not exist" That has been shown as being completely false, no m...

Post Posted: November 29th, 2005, 4:54 pm

Bompa wrote:
Wow! Gee! Golly whiz! Aren't you special.


Nope, just stating a fact. :)

Post Posted: November 29th, 2005, 11:38 am

vetofunk wrote:
"We registered a site 5 days ago, launched it yesterday officially. Today it is sitting at #11 for one of its main 2 keywords..."

I'd like know what competitive keywords you saw jump up to #11 in 5 days and remain there.


if you check that site again today, it is now at #8 :)

Post Posted: November 29th, 2005, 11:32 am

Hahaha Hi Barry :)

I figured you would like this thread :P

Post Posted: November 29th, 2005, 3:13 am

Ahh so now Barry (RustyBrick) is full of BS. I will make sure he sees that himself in the morning, seeing as I see him everyday. Knowing Barry, he may even get a laugh out of it when he blogs this thread on seroundtable :) Bompa: Don't feel bad, we all have these days where we say the wrong thing an...

Post Posted: November 28th, 2005, 11:22 pm

wow 2 people posted the link to the quote before i could even get back here. :P

Post Posted: November 28th, 2005, 9:25 pm

Well, if he used a different term has it not occurred to you that he might have been talking about something different? Since he said it in response to a direct question about the sandbox, No, I never did think he might be refering to anything else. Nobody with any intelligence would. No, because y...

Post Posted: November 28th, 2005, 4:07 pm

Quote:
Why does google hate me?


Your a webmaster.

Post Posted: November 28th, 2005, 3:41 pm

Okay, I promise, (fingers crossed behind back), this is the last time that I will try to wake up my fellow webmasters that have been mezmerized by the term "sandbox". Excellant post, it is a shame that it is as incorrect as they come. Matt Cutts, googles head of search, said differently. Only he us...

Post Posted: November 28th, 2005, 9:22 am

True enough. That would give a better identifier. Still not bad for competitiveness tho.

Post Posted: November 28th, 2005, 8:47 am

Maybe you didnt read it right :P

Results 1 - 10 of about 95,600,000

95 million results is not a bad number at all :P

Post Posted: November 28th, 2005, 8:20 am

It actually is now #26, however I know why. I lost a prominent link when a well known blog entry got moved off the front page. I expect it will be back on first page in a couple days :)

Post Posted: November 28th, 2005, 5:59 am

You would be surprised how many otherwise intelligent people have been taken by this one tho. It's sad really.

Post Posted: November 26th, 2005, 9:17 pm

That does not look like an autosubmitter at all.

it looks like a tool that helps you keep track of where you have submitted and who has accepted your site. Thats all.

Neat idea really, and useful.

Post Posted: November 26th, 2005, 9:12 pm

Axe wrote:
Nope, I'm seeing it at #10, reg'd only like 3 days ago.

BUT! let's see how long it stays there :)


Oh I agree 100% on that. As I said above, my google crystal ball broke, it may be there a few days, it may stick and stay. But it can be done again, which hasn't been possible in awhile now.

Post Posted: November 26th, 2005, 8:34 pm

Btw what are you asking for a side button on phpsector?

Nice site btw. You obviously put a lot of work into it.

Post Posted: November 25th, 2005, 6:58 pm

The fact that you register your domain for several years shows the search engines that you are serious about your website. Google sees this as a positive sign and thus influences how Google positions your site accordingly. Or they could get a patent which says they *could* use that data, then watch...

Post Posted: November 25th, 2005, 6:56 pm

But what's the competition like on those keywords? very competitive. And is your site going to stay there? Damnit, my google crystal ball broke!! New sites do get bumped up short-term, I've seen this too often in some of my domains when I register them for the first time, they start off on page one...

Post Posted: November 25th, 2005, 3:30 pm

But if somebody can truly show me a page that has never had any backlinks (either internal or external), but has a PR, I'll happily rethink my position :) Agreed. So far as yet, everyone who has brought up this arguement that i have seen, has missed something, and it was easily shown why the page h...

Post Posted: November 25th, 2005, 3:28 pm

I've got about 35 domain names right now, and the ones that I've had for several years (basically just parked with a single "Under Construction" page until I get around to creating the site), generally get Google exposure much quicker than those I've registered recently. I've also seen that even wi...

Post Posted: November 25th, 2005, 6:32 am

PageRank is ONLY based on backlinks - even if they're just internal backlinks. It's IMPOSSIBLE to get PR wihout backlinks as PR is (put simply) a visual representation of the number of backlinks a site has :) 0 Backlinks == 0 PR. I agree, however, if we find a page that has PR and has no backlinks ...

Post Posted: November 24th, 2005, 7:31 pm

Although I don't completely agree with vetofunk that the time online plays a huge role in ranking, You need to do some reading up yourself on Google's Patent application(s) last year. :) Google's Patent application itself states that site longevity (both how long it's been alive already, and how lo...

Post Posted: November 24th, 2005, 7:27 pm

If you've got a site, and 100% of the links on each page are internal pointing to other pages on your site, and you have no other external backlinks, then each of those internal pages linked to will get SOME PR (even if it's not high enough to actually rank as a full blown "1" on the toolbar). But,...

Post Posted: November 24th, 2005, 3:21 am

Now why would a woman get less interested when she has what she wants ??? The one constant in my opinion has always been that men dont change much thru a relationship unless made to, while women do. What she liked about him in the first place should be good enough still today, but it never is the c...

Post Posted: November 24th, 2005, 3:12 am

Beacuse only the inbound links count by the google. Not quite correct mate. Outbound can affect your websites PR as each page can send a total of approximately 85% of its total PageRank to outbound links. Now while it is true that this does not decrease that pages PageRank, the more outbound links ...

Post Posted: November 24th, 2005, 3:08 am

Google Bowling was a joke by a blackhat at seoblackhat.com

In all tests it has failed miserably. It does not work.

And Michael is generally smarter than to write an article like that without more research. He apparently took what someone on a forum said and ran with it.

Post Posted: November 24th, 2005, 3:03 am

tolkein wrote:
Use the one at FuturePR.net - it's based on multiple Google datacenters, unlike the rest.


only 1 DC matters in the calculation that these tools are basing off. And that is the current toolbar queries DC.

Post Posted: November 24th, 2005, 3:01 am

Axe wrote:
It's impossible for anybody to predict your pagerank.


I would have agreed with you 3 months ago. Now googles toolbar XML return does indeed give you a way to calculate your next updates PageRank. The iweb tool is almost always accurate.

Post Posted: November 24th, 2005, 2:55 am

You can get in google in a day by getting a single solid inbound link. The above addurl is unreliable at best. Google hates orphan pages and sites. Meaning they hate anything that does not have any links coming in to it. So trying to get in using the addurl, even if it succeeds, means that you are s...

Post Posted: July 15th, 2004, 9:20 am

LOL

Post Posted: July 15th, 2004, 9:00 am

jaydeep try: http://www.webmasterbrain.com/prog

Post Posted: July 12th, 2004, 5:49 pm

I think the more you use the account the more invites you build up.

Post Posted: July 11th, 2004, 6:50 pm

rtchar wrote:
No way it is done DAILY :lol:


I said the same thing above, but it is possible easily enough to do it every 3-4 days.

Post Posted: July 10th, 2004, 9:42 pm

Not quite true. Where??? I prefer to read from the king of pagerank: http://www.webworkshop.net I would post the exact URL to the pagerank papers, but the sites down at the moment. I know he has been having routing issues. To my way of thinking, the article you are reading is about toolbar PR or th...

Post Posted: July 10th, 2004, 11:24 am

I take it you guys have not been reading all the news reports on gmail. They read every piece of mail, they can do anything they want with your email contents. You gave them that right as soon as you accepted their terms. And thats not media paranoia, all this was stated by google themselves in inte...

Post Posted: July 10th, 2004, 11:21 am

True PR is updated everyday This is not very likely ... PR can only be calculated from a snap shot of the web at any given time. You cannot calculate PR for a page until you have calculated the PR for every incoming link. If there are any back links on the page it can increase the PR of the incomin...

Post Posted: July 10th, 2004, 11:16 am

Another option might be to bury the offending links in Javascript which will not be followed by search engines .... document.write('<a href="?s=0'">'); Might be a little more exact than banning robots from your site entirely. This is what I would have done a few months ago. However, if you ha...

Post Posted: July 10th, 2004, 4:47 am

I dont actually know if it is less effective or not to be honest. I DO know all the engines follow robots.txt, but I have never had to use the meta equiv. Some engines may ignore that.

Post Posted: July 10th, 2004, 2:10 am

From: http://www.searchengineworld.com/robots/robots_tutorial.htm [code] Disallow: The second part of a record consists of Disallow: directive lines. These lines specify files and/or directories. For example, the following line instructs spiders that it can not download email.htm...

Post Posted: July 10th, 2004, 12:04 am

I like my privacy thanks.

Post Posted: July 9th, 2004, 11:59 pm

hmm, well link:www.nucleo.co.uk Results 1 - 10 of about 181 linking to http://www.nucleo.co.uk. (0.27 seconds) link:www.inucleo.co.uk Results 1 - 10 of about 181 linking to http://www.inucleo.co.uk. (0.34 seconds) dont know if thats good or not lol well, sandbox effect...you would have to be in goo...

Post Posted: July 9th, 2004, 11:56 pm

Where did you get that information from that Google only lists pages that has a pr 4+ I don't think that is true. Actually it was quite true up til a couple months ago when google seemed to shake things up some. Now apparently we are also seeing links that will be GOING to PR4+ in the next update. ...

Post Posted: July 9th, 2004, 11:54 pm

Just remember that PR by itself means nearly nothing in the SERPS. It is the number of links with the proper anchor text that matters as far as rankings go.

Post Posted: July 9th, 2004, 11:52 pm

Lately google has been penalising sites for duplicate content. I would suggest using robots.txt to disallow the url with the ?stuff to robots. This should alleviate any issues you may have down the road.

Post Posted: June 25th, 2004, 9:33 am

Links to resources - I've been reading alot of speculation that goohoo are starting to look at pages named "links" and discounting them...you don't have to call it resources...but I wouldn't call it links...just to be safe. Agreed. Too many people reported this happening, that it may well have merit.

Post Posted: June 25th, 2004, 8:36 am

Nucleo wrote:
what should i put in these alt tags?


some people like stuffing them with keywords, but that could be seen as spamming. I personally try to put in text that describes what the link points to while still having one keyword in it towards the beginning of the tag.

Post Posted: June 25th, 2004, 12:37 am

only on images that are linked to something.
using alt tags on images that are not links doesnt help much if at all.

Post Posted: June 24th, 2004, 10:24 pm

Your friend may have picked up a penalty for something unrelated possibly. I have only seen the oldest cached versions stay in the game when duped content myself.

Post Posted: June 23rd, 2004, 3:57 pm

phaugh wrote:
If it were a matter of PR then a high PR site could wipe out an existing site by post identical content.


exactly.

Post Posted: June 23rd, 2004, 12:38 pm

so far every instance we have seen of it happening is always to the newest pages. Grandfathered pages dont ever seem to be affected.

Post Posted: June 23rd, 2004, 12:37 pm

why would you do that?

each title should target a different keyphrase. with them all the same you are just wasting valuable area.

Post Posted: June 23rd, 2004, 9:44 am

I guess it would depend on your need or want of self-promotion.

Post Posted: June 23rd, 2004, 9:43 am

sly beat me to it :)

Post Posted: June 23rd, 2004, 7:39 am

Google put a patent out on it even. They patented a method of "fingerprinting" what it considers keyphrases in pages and can check the fingerprint against all other docs in their index. It really is not hard, you just have to realize that google has 10,000 machines at it's disposal to load balance t...

Post Posted: June 23rd, 2004, 7:36 am

Seems the update is still going on. I am still seeing lots of stuff jumping around.

Post Posted: June 23rd, 2004, 7:32 am

I would have to agree. It is looking a lot cleaner now.

Post Posted: June 6th, 2004, 5:33 pm

The situation has been amicably resolved fully, and Greg and David may even be doing some things together as each has qualities the other needs. So it may well be mutually beneficial for both of them. I always love seeing that happen when it does. Its been a good experience at any rate, and thats wh...

Post Posted: June 6th, 2004, 3:18 pm

Keeping Informed: After numerous emails back and forth with Greg, the owner of the checkpr sites using Davids scripts, it appears as if he realizes the problem, admits there is a problem, and was duped by a coder who made like he wrote the scripts himself. Either way I have notified him that the sit...

Post Posted: June 6th, 2004, 12:57 am

Thanks all for helping support David like this. A DMCA takedown notice has been sent to his host and their uplink too for good measure.

Post Posted: June 5th, 2004, 8:51 pm

Okay, not often do I get emotionally involved in stuff that really does not concern me, but this needs to be shown to the world. I recently had an email exchange with the owner of http://webmasterbrain.com who wrote the PRoogle search engine that showed PR values next to all listings. Seems he is th...

Post Posted: May 10th, 2004, 12:18 pm

what major change?

Post Posted: May 10th, 2004, 11:49 am

Yeh, its neverending really. As soon as a spidering run is complete they rerank the pages that were included in that run. Then the process starts over with the next batch.

Post Posted: May 7th, 2004, 10:52 am

phaugh wrote:
Does anyone know what the criteria is for sites that are viewed as "similar"? I'm referring to the "similar pages" link next to sites in the SERPs.


It appears to see related sites as sites that link to you.

Post Posted: May 7th, 2004, 4:32 am

pete, one thing I think you are missing in your summation. Sure scripts can see things like that, but you have to realize the sheer resource drain every little tiny thing you add takes up when you have an index of 5 billion websites cached competely. It may seem simple from a single page point of vi...

Post Posted: May 6th, 2004, 9:22 am

phaugh wrote:
I thought when a site was unranked or not in the index the toolbar would read "Current Page is not ranked by google". Just like this post.


yer correct. The toolbar doesnt try to "guess" anything.

Post Posted: May 6th, 2004, 9:21 am

Heres the best way I have ever heard of describing "spam"...

If you link 5-10 sites together that are relevant, it is creative marketing. If your competitor does it, it is spam. :)

Post Posted: May 5th, 2004, 9:37 pm

Google has been going after crosslinkers for a long time now with their algo. They have not stopped anything, nor will they. That snippet is nothing more than a ploy to make the people buying their stock feel assured that they are trying to do something about it. If some people would put as much eff...

Post Posted: May 5th, 2004, 9:34 pm

did you use adsense on the page?

Post Posted: May 5th, 2004, 9:33 pm

amazon has buko backlinks.

Post Posted: April 7th, 2004, 9:49 pm

Dont fret yet. So far on 4 boards i visit, everyone is seeing some rather odd stuff. Give it til friday before worrying too hard on it. Everythings bounching like mad right now.

Post Posted: April 7th, 2004, 9:40 pm

Well then you will love the fact that a new PR/IBL update started yesterday and is showing strong today. I expect it to last til friday morning.

Post Posted: March 31st, 2004, 5:43 am

nice offer guy :)

Post Posted: March 18th, 2004, 6:44 pm

jfvb1225 wrote:
Okay thanks. Im running my site in a couple SEO spider simulator sites, and theyre showing all my ibls are valid.


you should check out http://anchorwizard.com for a full range of IBL tools :)

Post Posted: March 18th, 2004, 5:56 pm

Axe, (or whoever), how can you tell if a site with a link to you on it is hiding it in javascript or not? it would look like this:
Code: [ Select ]
<a href="Javascript:go('http://domain.com');">
or even like: [code]<a href="#" onclick="Javascript&#...

Post Posted: March 18th, 2004, 3:53 pm

yeh spammers are making it harder. its always been that way with link popularity tho in all the major engines.

Post Posted: March 18th, 2004, 10:52 am

This is an excellant article on how pagerank actually works including the basic formula for how pr is distributed. And it comes from the site that Dan Thies has coined "the home of pagerank". It may help you understand what PR is actually all about. http://webworkshop.net/pagerank.html btw, no it is...

Post Posted: March 18th, 2004, 10:48 am

Ill agree with the casinos and pharmacies bit :P But the only way pr drops is if linking sites PR drops, or in the case of a major PR/IBL update a ton of brand new sites are included in the update, thus spreading PR out in the affected categories. Those are the only 2 ways that your pagerank can dec...

Post Posted: March 18th, 2004, 10:34 am

vetofunk: For the most part I understand why you worry about these things. But, as someone else pointed out elsewhere this very morning, people used to talk about possible penalties for other things that are still working fine today, years later. People should spend more time working with what works...

Post Posted: March 18th, 2004, 10:30 am

Not necessarily, because if Google loads a URL that contains Google AdSense script, they don't use the 4 random links that come up in the AdSense, and count them as links to those URLs. So, how would they be in violation? I don't think it was suggested that Google would tell you to not sell ad spac...

Post Posted: March 18th, 2004, 9:41 am

I have noticed a few SEO sites that were a Page Rank of 8 go down to 7. One even gained 4000 IBLs but still dropped a PR point. Someday Google will filter out textlinks with a proximity towards sponsored links, IMHO. Why in the world would google do that? If google makes it policy that you cant sel...

Post Posted: March 17th, 2004, 2:00 pm

some people link to blogs for a single quote that catches their attention.

Post Posted: March 17th, 2004, 1:52 pm

Just looked at my blog, jumped from a PR of 3 to a 5. Haven't even done anything to it in weeks. I am liking this update more and more. You dont ever have to do anything. PR is only updated beyond google's initial ranking by aquiring inbound links. Check your IBL's and you should see some new ones.

Post Posted: March 17th, 2004, 1:11 pm

If you do pay attention to your IBL's check out http://anchorwizard.com

nice way to see your trends, etc

Post Posted: March 17th, 2004, 12:57 pm

pagerank is one thing, but that alone doesnt help your rankings. Lot's of inbound links from high PR sites can shoot you to the top of the serps. The links we sell generally give you between 500-1000 inbound links from pr4-8 pages :) It was these same links that put webworkshop.net in #1 for his key...

Post Posted: March 17th, 2004, 11:38 am

benoitb wrote:
question,

are there any websites where one could pay for, a text link with a high pr?



http://webworkshop.net/seoforum/viewtopic.php?t=272

that will tell you all you need to know

Post Posted: March 17th, 2004, 12:13 am

Google has indeed been doing an IBL/PR update.

Post Posted: March 6th, 2004, 8:55 pm

It means you were probably seeing results you liked during the rolling update fluxuations when one particular datacenters results were showing shile the main datacenter sync'd.

.

Post Posted: March 3rd, 2004, 1:54 pm

I do not know what is going to happen to the current listings that are in there right now. Maybe they will stay, maybe they will stay, but at a terrible position, or maybe they will be knocked out. I do know though, you will not be able to get into Yahoo or MSN through the Inktomi product submit an...

Post Posted: March 3rd, 2004, 1:52 pm

when you do the "link:" command it will show you all site that link to you. When you use the backlink tool in the Google toolbar, you will only see sites that have at least a PR of 4 linking to you. Is this what your asking? I was not asking anything. I stated that using the link: search the result...

Post Posted: March 3rd, 2004, 1:28 pm

Axe wrote:
The lilpop checker on nuclei's site

http://enginemage.com/linkpop.html


first off that checker has not been updated in 6 months, and probably needs it in a bad way.

secondly google only shows PR4+ links publicly in their link: search, so they will always show less.

Post Posted: March 3rd, 2004, 1:26 pm

I do not know what is going to happen to the current listings that are in there right now. Maybe they will stay, maybe they will stay, but at a terrible position, or maybe they will be knocked out. I do know though, you will not be able to get into Yahoo or MSN through the Inktomi product submit an...

Post Posted: March 3rd, 2004, 1:10 pm

vetofunk wrote:
Great Find!


You mean "thanks for building it", I think :P

Post Posted: March 3rd, 2004, 1:09 pm

It does not start till April 15th. Right now everyone is in there for free. This Overture/Yahoo thing has the SEO community very upset. I too have great rankings in Yahoo right now, but that is not going to be late next month. Yahoo is turning into the next Looksmart/MSN relationship. Yes, you can ...

Post Posted: March 2nd, 2004, 10:19 pm

it is perfectly readable. his error is this line #if (request_method() eq "GET") he cant call an elsif if he does use the starting if pretty simple for anyone who knows more than just php :P LOL ! I didn't mean to say it was completly illegible, it could just look a lot better using 'switch', more ...

Post Posted: March 2nd, 2004, 10:02 pm

why not set a line in a mysql table when they upload an image with the images path, etc, then a scheduled script could actually do the resizing in the background later.

Post Posted: March 2nd, 2004, 9:58 pm

it is perfectly readable. his error is this line

#if (request_method() eq "GET")


he cant call an elsif if he does use the starting if

pretty simple for anyone who knows more than just php :P

Post Posted: March 2nd, 2004, 9:13 pm

I totally agree with Axe on this one. Content is the single most reason for visiting a website. It cant just be any old content but content people will find useful. You cant just set up a forum like this and expect people to visit it unless it already has interesting users but this then becomes a c...

Post Posted: March 2nd, 2004, 9:11 pm

If you need to get your site spidered quickly, make sure to get links from as many places as possible. Axe may have said this, but I was only skimming. :wink: You need to get your site into directories such as DMOZ, Joeant, Websavvy, Gimpsy, and others. These will help get your site spidered quickl...

Post Posted: March 2nd, 2004, 9:09 pm

why the hell would you pay for inclusion?

every one of our sites are listed and every one holds decent ranks without ever paying a dime.

Post Posted: March 2nd, 2004, 9:03 pm

They started changing last night as a matter of fact. We had been testing a new instant ranking tool http://4retards.com/ibl/ranker.php and we saw all kinds of fluctuations all night. Reminded me sorta of the old dance :P In my opinion, the new rolling update is a good thing. It means we dont have t...

Post Posted: March 2nd, 2004, 9:00 pm

Most people are seeing an almost pre-florida rollback after Brandy. As for Alexa ratings, please do not be fooled into thinking they mean a damn thing. They do not. They are based on who has the alexa toolbar and what sites *those* people visit. That is a very small number of people comparatively. T...

Post Posted: March 2nd, 2004, 8:56 pm

you can see all links by searching for domain +.com And google has no way of knowing what user interaction there is on links on remote websites. So the number of people clicking links does not play into the equation at all. each page that links to you without you passing a link back leaks a tiny bit...

Post Posted: February 27th, 2004, 4:53 am

All of our sites are high quality informational websites, most with hundreds and even thousands of pages of pure content. That sounds very good, but the pages are, I suppose, not always (and probably rarely) relevant to the sites. I do believe that a link coming from a page which talk about astrono...

Post Posted: February 27th, 2004, 2:56 am

webcertain wrote:
Anyone could use IBL, but not from any pages.. :wink:


I dont use just any pages. All of our sites are high quality informational websites, most with hundreds and even thousands of pages of pure content.

Post Posted: February 27th, 2004, 2:33 am

Oh and while we are on the subject of keyworded anchors, if anyone could use say 500 extra IBL's or more, let me know in PM here :)

Post Posted: February 27th, 2004, 2:31 am

One more thing on anchor text and why it is important. An example is if you did a search for "miserable failure" on Google. Look at number #1. Do you think they phrase is anywhere in that site? No, its only there because many other sites used that phrase in their anchor text that linked to the site...

Post Posted: February 11th, 2004, 4:34 am

look in your domains access logs

Post Posted: February 9th, 2004, 12:19 pm

I do not quite believe the theory either. But there is one engine that uses something like that. They base there rankings on authority sites and that is Teoma. I have heard that about Teoma before too. Just off the wall here, but if anyone is looking to get 500-1000 high profile, high PR links, and...

Post Posted: February 1st, 2004, 10:08 pm

check this for latest updation http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=237&c=1 :) This person obviously has no idea. He is stating things as if they are hard and fast facts in that article, not theories. There have been NO conclusive tests yet to verify the existence of a hilltop expert ...

Post Posted: February 1st, 2004, 8:41 pm

I take SEO seriously but I only swap with related sites cos that what my user wants. Put users 1st then SEO However Inktomi reads Bold and Headed text on the referring url so Google could do the same in the future! The Theory is talked about in googe http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/127/ By making...

Post Posted: February 1st, 2004, 8:35 pm

It is my experience that PR will always fluctuate as more and more similar sites to yours are added to the web. The thing to remember is that pr is spread out across all similar sites. The more sites the lessening degree of pr available to each.

Post Posted: February 1st, 2004, 8:31 pm

Most forums (including phpbb and vBulletin 2.x) require the application fo a simple mod/hack to kill the sessions IDs for the Google bots. after that, they are open for indexing. :) With vB3 it's automatic, though I've noted serious concerns about the duplication of content in vBulletin 3's draggin...

Post Posted: February 1st, 2004, 8:26 pm

It doesnt take any time or effort actually. We have a network of sites that can guarantee you a minimum of 400+ links from webmaster and surfer related sites that are pr 4-8. If anyone cares I can show proof that a link from us can boost your ranking and PR immesurably.

Post Posted: October 24th, 2003, 12:29 am

dr nick feel free to drop me an email anytime. As to how it works, why not ask seguru.net who shows true and proper PR values for every expired domain they have listed :) also i can show you our online example, simply enter a list of one url per line and press submit then check what it gives as PR a...

Post Posted: October 22nd, 2003, 7:54 am

Heres an idea. Take the PR calculator we already have and make a spider to go along with it that forever searches the web and checks PR rating on every site it comes across. If that sites PR is equal to or higher than a preset value by you, then the spider emails that websites owners requesting a li...

Post Posted: September 17th, 2003, 12:42 pm

ATNO/TW: that is correct.

Post Posted: September 16th, 2003, 4:39 am

Bigwebmaster, very nice, concise description of exactly what happens. For the life of me I could not explain it without writing a book. I will however say that in the early editions of XP and xp office, smart tags were indeed enabled by default. and there are now a great number of (spyware, adware) ...

Post Posted: September 15th, 2003, 5:02 pm

Okay,

lemme just show you a url or 2 on it to clarify instead of writing a book here :)

http://www.zdnet.com/anchordesk/stories ... 67,00.html

Post Posted: September 15th, 2003, 3:33 pm

actually you should use it on every single html page you have. What it does is stop MS partners from using your sites as free advertising. Any html text is exploitable.

Post Posted: September 15th, 2003, 2:30 pm

there should only be one popunder.

Post Posted: September 15th, 2003, 12:07 pm

deadz, I dont tell anyone the exact formula, but will say it is an odd variant similar to crc32, with an extra number thrown in for good measure.

You can ask bigwebmaster if my system works.

Post Posted: September 14th, 2003, 12:51 am

I take it you have never used oracle?

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 11:48 pm

Nope, if I click on a regular link it passes referer.

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 11:48 pm

we get all other referers fine.

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 11:36 pm

Yes, but the suit itself was not in their name. and the child being a minor it would not affect them. However, nobody wants court cases, no matter the outcome associated with their name.

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 11:35 pm

Maybe it is just the way my techs setup our boxes, but.....


216.175.77.24 - - [12/Sep/2003:23:24:36 -0700] "GET / HTTP/1.1" 304 - "" "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)"

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 11:30 pm

will send you answers to both in PM.

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 11:27 pm

Try it :)

As far as I have seen in our apache logs over 13 differant servers, no referer carries over when using a target="_blank"

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 11:26 pm

Oh I agree 100% with your thoughts, but suing the child? Would it not be a better example to go after the parents for allowing the child open access to do what he is doing?

Seems to me if that started happening then parents might start wising up a little.

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 11:22 pm

Sorry about that, this early in the morning my devilish side comes out :P

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 11:21 pm

The last time it was changed was in May of this year. Was a year before that that they did it last.

I can send you a link to our script live in PM if you like mate, if you have doubts we did it :D

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 11:00 pm

#1. If this is finacial data I would go with either MySQL, PostGreSQL, or Oracle.
#2. If the database is going to grow fast and as huge as you make it sound, I would definately go with Oracle or PostGreSQL.


Hope that helps.

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 10:53 pm

Perl and Perl based CGI
PHP
TCL
VB (basic)
C (basic)
I dont consider html an actual code language as it is just markup but know it as well as xml/xsl/rss/css/rewrite

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 10:48 pm

Hi PK,

if you have not found a way to do this yet, drop me an email and I can write something in perl or php to do exactly what you need. william@perlcoders.com

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 10:46 pm

The easiest way to do this is simply to use target="_blank" for all links you do not want to show referer to the site.

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 10:44 pm

Or you can email me about the script we have that does it in mass quantities.

The hardest part was caculating the checksum.

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 10:42 pm

Free Fonts Galore: http://fontmage.com

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 10:40 pm

Personally i think the best meta tag nowadays is this one:

Code: [ Select ]
<META NAME="MSSmartTagsPreventParsing" CONTENT="TRUE">


This stops them from using your website text as advertising spots for their partners products.

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 10:35 pm

Bah, I am too new to clap, guess I'll just have to fart instead :P

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 10:34 pm

Well right or not, suing a 13 year old? Thats taking it a bit too far i think....

Post Posted: September 12th, 2003, 10:30 pm

Hi Guys and Gals,

As you can tell I am new to this forum and just wanted to say HI!

Looks like a nice places, I expect I will be around a bit :D
  • Sort by
 
 

© 1998-2017. Ozzu® is a registered trademark of Unmelted, LLC.