Search found 46 matches

Actual Results

Post Posted: February 2nd, 2007, 1:29 am

I've found that referrals from images.google.com don't result in a single sale or click on a banner advertisement. They're coming for the images, they see them, and either steal them or close out their browser. I've banned Google's image search from even seeing any of my sites. Hi Axe, If you're se...

Post Posted: August 21st, 2006, 12:39 am

Strange indeed.. reinforce hte idea that the sampling of backlinks in G. is just for fun.
Yahoo's explorer results are reassuring...
Cheers,
Johann

Post Posted: August 18th, 2006, 3:00 am

Just make sure you don't use the backlinks shortcut in G. to check if such a link is coming up as G only shows a sample... Y! is more reliable.
Cheers,
Johann

Post Posted: March 2nd, 2005, 4:34 am

Any problem in Google Kashyap?
Cheers,
Johann

Post Posted: March 2nd, 2005, 1:23 am

[quote="Olga T."] Must I submit my pages again? (Somewhere I read that Yahoo doesn't like that pages that are already in their database are submitted again). /quote] Hi Olga, I wouldn't think submitting again (but it might hurt ..). Links building would be the best thing to do right now.. ...

Post Posted: January 12th, 2005, 1:49 am

Duplicate pages is not a good idea (Google will ignore one, at best!!)
Cheers,
Johann

Post Posted: January 12th, 2005, 1:10 am

2 urls, same text? :evil:

Post Posted: January 10th, 2005, 8:17 am

The list of their source for the searches is indeed a bit vague :roll:

Post Posted: January 10th, 2005, 3:02 am

Hi vetofunk,
Have you tried prioritysubmit search term research? Are the datas reliable or spoiled by ranking checks and co.?
Cheers,
Johann

Post Posted: January 10th, 2005, 2:57 am

Not available for a UK based search.. Anybody tried from Canada?
Cheers,
Johann

Post Posted: November 30th, 2004, 7:07 am

I'm not sure it will help, as your web hosting company might sub-contract the hosting in oz or us..
IMO a tld in .co.uk is the safest solution..
Cheers,
Johann

Post Posted: November 17th, 2004, 3:59 am

May I recommend this great tutorial from Ian McAnerin? It's a great guide to robots.txt
Cheers,
Johann

Post Posted: August 26th, 2004, 6:37 am

vision wrote:

A keyword pair is 1% or 2% density? If you have a pair, but they are not directly together then what would you calculate it as?

That's why side by side is not such a bad solution.. You can always add a proximity review afterwards..

Post Posted: August 26th, 2004, 6:34 am

darksat wrote:
I would concentrate on title tag and meta discription though.

The most interesting feature is to be able to analyse meta tags and the page copy separately..

Post Posted: August 26th, 2004, 5:03 am

Hi vision,
Keyword density is the number of occurences of a keyword divided by either the total number of words (unique words or not, up to you..).
To be a 2 words keyphrase it needs to be side by side and repeated..
Cheers,
Johann
  • Sort by
 
 

© Unmelted Enterprises 1998-2009. Driven by phpBB © 2001-2009 phpBB Group.