Search found 1395 matches

Actual Results

Post Posted: November 7th, 2009, 11:54 am

Weird. I wonder why I don't see 'em?

Post Posted: November 7th, 2009, 5:01 am

google.uk has been having a Sesame Sreet themed logo over the last three days: 5th November: http://imgrr.com/x/40thannive.gif 6th November: http://imgrr.com/x/40thaneve.gif 7th November: http://imgrr.com/x/40thanfjf.gif If a new one appears tomorrow I'll add it t...

Post Posted: August 27th, 2009, 2:37 am

Maybe the Poles did it because they are not fans of racial discrimination?

Post Posted: August 21st, 2009, 10:50 pm

This should be the culprit:

Code: [ Download ] [ Select ]
.postlink:hover {
    background-color: #f6f6f6;
    text-decoration: none;
    color: #404040;
}
  1. .postlink:hover {
  2.     background-color: #f6f6f6;
  3.     text-decoration: none;
  4.     color: #404040;
  5. }

Post Posted: August 20th, 2009, 2:42 am

Make sure you save the page in UTF-8 format. This is critical and something many people either forget to do or don't realise has to be done. If you were using notepad when you save the file make sure you select "UTF-8" from the encoding drop-down menu. Other editors like Notepad2 can be se...

Post Posted: August 20th, 2009, 2:34 am

For those who'd like more info on the image: it is, of course, the very famous Hubble Ultra Deep Field image: wiki link, NASA link.

Over 10,000 galaxies in that image...

*cough" for those wishing to create their own, here's the download page for the originals: link

Post Posted: August 18th, 2009, 2:12 am

Hubble simply doesn't have the resolving power to see such fine detail on the moon. While moon-gazing, Hubble has a resolution of around 70 m - maeaning that an object the size of the Superdome would appear as a small fuzzy blob with almost no detail and that a flag would never, ever be able to be s...

Post Posted: August 12th, 2009, 11:35 am

I'm not sure what's going on at your end, since each page works perfectly for me. This is my code for the "links" page: [code]<div id="header"> <ul> <li><a href="http://owenconti.com/index.html">owenconti</a></li> <li><a href...

Post Posted: August 11th, 2009, 2:10 pm

You've applied the class "work" to some pages and the class "active" to others. There is no class "active" in your css. In your css, the "work" class has the 45px padding - which is why the "work" and "links" pages look fine and why the &qu...

Post Posted: August 11th, 2009, 10:32 am

Didn't you forget the 45px padding?

When I look at the "work" page the spacing is off. If I add the padding of 45 px, like in my example, it look fine.

Post Posted: August 10th, 2009, 4:47 pm

Remove the link from the link text entirely and give the <li> element a class of "current" (or whatever name you like best). So, for the links page it would look like this: [code]<div id="header"> <ul> <li><a href="http://owenconti.com/index.html&q...

Post Posted: August 10th, 2009, 4:36 pm

You should put the title tags within the head section, like so: [code]<html>     <head>     <title>Submit your Property<title>         <style type="text/css">             body { font-size: 12px; font-family: "Arial"; }             p,td { font-size: 1...

Post Posted: August 8th, 2009, 12:00 pm

In other news: Bill Clinton negotiates the release of two US citizens from North Korea that were busted for criminal activities against the state. Go figure.

Post Posted: August 5th, 2009, 10:52 pm

If you're still stuck, try the following:

Open your static site in a browser, view source and post here the code between the <head> tags. Do the same for the dynamic site. Also post a part of the css file that mentions a background image.

Post Posted: August 4th, 2009, 3:50 am

On the "how to" page of jQzoom the examples (as you know) look like this:
Code: [ Download ] [ Select ]
<a href="images/BIGIMAGE.JPG" class="MYCLASS"  title="MYTITLE"> <img src="images/SMALLIMAGE.JPG" title="IMAGE TITLE" ></a>
So if I unde...
  • Sort by
 
 

© Unmelted Enterprises 1998-2009. Driven by phpBB © 2001-2009 phpBB Group.