Search found 2105 matches

Actual Results

Post Posted: July 3rd, 2006, 5:27 am

well now there is lol

http://www.ixtlanstudios.com/webimages/purple-cow.jpg

Post Posted: July 3rd, 2006, 5:09 am

well....this is closest I came http://www.morganindustriesinc.com/cuttingcosts.htm On the second, I don't think its possible to build a database of everyones vehicle at this time. here is a better one http://www.moldcompanies.com/hooblermachine/ Lets build our own http://members.aol.com/GCGassaway/v...

Post Posted: July 3rd, 2006, 5:00 am

But did anyone ever remember the cartoon as well? lol....maybe I am a sad product of the 80s

Post Posted: July 3rd, 2006, 4:58 am

Interesting. I doubt one could think of anything that another couldn't provide a link about.

Post Posted: June 29th, 2006, 5:37 pm

Yea, I had stumbled upon her picture a long time ago when she was about 19.

She really was attractive then, haven't heard much about her until this thread..

Post Posted: June 29th, 2006, 5:33 pm

david murphy wrote:
come to think of it, carla was the only dog on the show.


hehe.....she gets my vote for ugliest tv actress.

Post Posted: June 28th, 2006, 2:11 pm

I don't recall ever seeing eddie in cheers. That sure was one smart dog though.

Post Posted: June 26th, 2006, 5:42 pm

that is true...Ill take the 15%

Post Posted: June 26th, 2006, 5:41 pm

from the start menu (im assuming you are using xp here), go to control panel. Pick appearnces and themes. On the left menu there will be a fonts section. This will bring up your fonts folder. Then you simply drag and drop the font and it will install. And I think in all windows installs it C:\WINDOW...

Post Posted: June 26th, 2006, 8:36 am

where did you buy this dedicated server?

Post Posted: June 26th, 2006, 8:25 am

With fonts all you need to do is install the fonts in the windows font directory, and next time you load PS they will be there

As far as brushes http://www.photoshop.brushes.btinternet ... shes.shtml

this is the same basically for photoshop 7 and CS as well

Post Posted: June 26th, 2006, 8:22 am

wow, not many would be able to do that

Post Posted: June 25th, 2006, 7:20 am

Ive had better quality and few problems with T-mobile then I have had with Cingular here.

Most of my friends have switched to T-mobile as well.

Post Posted: June 25th, 2006, 7:18 am

I always use winamp....It seems to do pretty well and Ive never had a reason to switch.

Beleive it or not my wife used to use realplayer before we started dating. Heh, I quickly broke her of that terrible player

Post Posted: June 24th, 2006, 1:42 pm

yeah file > edit in imageready, then save optimized as....

Post Posted: June 24th, 2006, 9:39 am

yea its definately tedious

Post Posted: June 24th, 2006, 9:34 am

ok I got it. What you want to do when you export it back to imageready is Save Optimized As.... Here is what I got, course i didn't spend much time removing the artifacts....with a little time you will get what your looking for http://ixtlanstudios.com/webimages/icon.gif as you can see t...

Post Posted: June 24th, 2006, 7:27 am

Actually its a little different working with these...

I have to take off for an hour, When I come back I will work on how to do it if you haven't figured it out by then.

Post Posted: June 24th, 2006, 7:14 am

well yeah....You need to zoom in that image in PS and just remove all the white manually then. It doesn't seem like many pixels. http://www.ixtlanstudios.com/webimages/smiley.jpg I selcted these pixels with the magic wand tool, tolerance 32. But I have no experience with animation in...

Post Posted: June 23rd, 2006, 11:54 pm

try this http://www.ozzu.com/digital-art-forum/transparant-gifs-t64356.html And if your having some white spots surrounding the gif, you may have to zoom in the image and physically remove the artifacts in every frame to get a smooth animation. BTW could you post an example of these artifacts?

Post Posted: June 23rd, 2006, 12:58 pm

Also if you are going the magic wand route, you may find that lowering the tolerance may give you a broader selection

Post Posted: June 22nd, 2006, 4:09 pm

But it is a good link :P

In retrospect I didn't realize that it has even been posted in this thread a few times.....oops

Post Posted: June 22nd, 2006, 1:03 pm

lets look at the wayback machine

http://web.archive.org/web/200302160204 ... .ozzu.com/

Post Posted: June 22nd, 2006, 12:55 pm

Ouch, that sounds quite painful.

I was half expected you to talk about how much you saved on car insurance. :P

Post Posted: June 22nd, 2006, 12:53 pm

[bbcodeoff] should be implemented, Im suprised it hasn't by now...seems silly to use [code]

Post Posted: June 22nd, 2006, 12:19 pm

I understand your point, and Im sure we would have many different opinions on this. An artist has his tools - brushes, a sculptor – a chisel However, those tools don't use themselves to create a work. With the absense of human input it just seems synthetic to me. Its not to say that it isn't good, i...

Post Posted: June 21st, 2006, 7:22 pm

that reminds me of the movie 'boiler room'

Post Posted: June 21st, 2006, 7:03 pm

So an artist draws one abstract, and a computer synthesizes the rest?

Im not sure I understand it correctly.

Neat, but one wonders if the synthesized images would actually be considered art.
  • Sort by
 
cron
 

© 1998-2014. Ozzu® is a registered trademark of Unmelted, LLC.