To be continued. . .

So you don't think the title of my site is important in the review topic?

Oh and you misread - the service on my site is not ready yet. It's coming in March. My site is just explaining the service.

The reason I do not like ". . ." is because it indicates an incomplete title. When it was allowed it was abused greatly. The purpose of titles on Ozzu is to be as descriptive as possible within the allowed space to represent what your topic is about so that people know if they even want to read the thread or not. If ". . ." is used it indicates that they must now open the thread to even see if its something they want to read. When I see a title to an article or a book, I usually do not see titles ending with . . . very often. SEO wise for ozzu the ". . ." doesn't help very much, having an extremely descriptive title that fits within the space seems to work best to bring threads at ozzu on top of google. That will bring the original topic creator the exposure they deserve so that they can increase the chances of getting the replies they are looking for (if a regular member hasn't already done so).

I think the topic is just there to get the point accost of what your site is about. If the title can do that then great. But I have a feeling if someone sees the title IsMyWebsite they might think its a person site which it inst really from what I can see.

What does converting ... to . do?