Internet Explorer - CSS BUGS

  • wsnfree
  • Newbie
  • Newbie
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Jan 29, 2008
  • Posts: 9
  • Status: Offline

Post January 29th, 2008, 12:24 pm

I am very new to CSS ... i created my website template on Mozilla Firefox..... but it looks frustrated in Internet Explorer... is there any Debugging Software for this?

have a look: http://wsnfree.com
  • Anonymous
  • Bot
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: 25 Feb 2008
  • Posts: ?
  • Loc: Ozzuland
  • Status: Online

Post January 29th, 2008, 12:24 pm

  • celandine
  • Mastermind
  • Mastermind
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Oct 30, 2007
  • Posts: 1982
  • Loc: Belgrade, Serbia
  • Status: Offline

Post January 29th, 2008, 12:42 pm

I don't think you can just 'debug' it - you'll have to fix the code so it works in both explorer and FF.....
Eagles may soar in the sky but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

celandine designblog
  • Zwirko
  • Guru
  • Guru
  • User avatar
  • Joined: May 29, 2005
  • Posts: 1397
  • Loc: 55° N, 3° W
  • Status: Offline

Post January 29th, 2008, 4:26 pm

The closest thing you will find to a "debug" tool is the W3C validation tools:

Try these links:

validates your html

validates your css - ignore the warnings but do look at the errors.
  • Atrus
  • Novice
  • Novice
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Jan 28, 2008
  • Posts: 17
  • Status: Offline

Post January 29th, 2008, 6:00 pm

I've found CSE HTML Validator a useful tool for validating that kind of stuff. Much better than W3's.
  • dyefade
  • Expert
  • Expert
  • User avatar
  • Joined: May 22, 2004
  • Posts: 718
  • Loc: UK
  • Status: Offline

Post January 29th, 2008, 6:05 pm

Atrus wrote:
I've found CSE HTML Validator a useful tool for validating that kind of stuff. Much better than W3's.

What's the advantage? I've never found W3C's wanting.

Post January 30th, 2008, 1:26 am

Atrus wrote:
I've found CSE HTML Validator a useful tool for validating that kind of stuff. Much better than W3's.

Yeah, I don't see anything wrong with W3's validator either ... I just tried using CSE, nd IMO it sucks ... what do you see better in CSE's?
RewriteEngine On

RewriteRule ^(awesome|excellent|extraordinary)$ RT
  • Atrus
  • Novice
  • Novice
  • No Avatar
  • Joined: Jan 28, 2008
  • Posts: 17
  • Status: Offline

Post January 31st, 2008, 11:57 am

I get better explanations of errors with CSE than with W3's. I'm not saying W3's is bad, not at all. My opinion is CSE gives me more information and easier ability to fix and verify quicker as well.

Just my opinion.

Post January 31st, 2008, 1:03 pm

Atrus wrote:
I get better explanations of errors with CSE than with W3's. I'm not saying W3's is bad, not at all. My opinion is CSE gives me more information and easier ability to fix and verify quicker as well.

Just my opinion.

Ah okay, I see, usually I don't get a lot of errors so I know exactly what it is immediately ... that's why the little-to-no-information from W3C doesn't bother me ...
RewriteEngine On

RewriteRule ^(awesome|excellent|extraordinary)$ RT
  • theak
  • Proficient
  • Proficient
  • User avatar
  • Joined: Jun 11, 2004
  • Posts: 438
  • Loc: Taipei, Taiwan
  • Status: Offline

Post January 31st, 2008, 2:28 pm

http://www.htmlvalidator.com/htmlval/wh ... etter.html
Trust the Monkey
http://www.ironricebowl.com

Post Information

  • Total Posts in this topic: 9 posts
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests
  • You cannot post new topics in this forum
  • You cannot reply to topics in this forum
  • You cannot edit your posts in this forum
  • You cannot delete your posts in this forum
  • You cannot post attachments in this forum
 
 

© Unmelted Enterprises 1998-2009. Driven by phpBB © 2001-2009 phpBB Group.